COVID-19 may prompt three structural shifts in commercial real estate

The coronavirus pandemic has altered the way the world lives and works with stunning speed. We have to assume the implications for the commercial real estate industry will be abrupt. Several emerging themes have the potential to distinguish the current cycle from the last, and we’re preparing for three structural shifts likely to affect property markets: a revaluation of just-in-time supply chains, an acceleration of e-commerce adoption, and a reassessment of workplace flexibility and density considerations.

While we’ve repeatedly struggled with pestilence—including the Black Death of 1348, the cholera epidemic of the 1820s, and the emergence of AIDS in the 1980s—history offers no precise parallel to what we’re experiencing now.¹ Even in 2003, when SARS was identified, the global movement of people, raw materials, and products didn’t match the velocity and volume we’ve grown accustomed to seeing in more recent years.² The interdependent web of transport networks, shuttling humans and their wares worldwide from one commercial hub to the next, has helped spread COVID-19 much farther and faster than it might have only a decade or two ago.

History offers no precise parallel to what we’re experiencing now.

Working remotely, we’re collaborating with our colleagues, our tenants, and our investors to slow the spread of the disease, as we also continue to carry out our fiduciary duties in managing commercial real estate portfolios.

We’re also paying close attention to capital markets to monitor new deal flow (none), completed transactions (few), failed transactions (several), pricing discovery (too early), and debt financings (paused). While most segments of the market will suffer some degree of near-term disruption, some property types aren’t as well positioned as others. Real estate linked to the hospitality and service segments, including hotels and retail centers, might be the most immediately vulnerable, although grocery-anchored retail complexes appear more insulated. Longer term, what’s likely to be normal in 2021 and beyond probably won’t reflect business as usual in 2019. We see the COVID-19 experience as a possible driver of at least three structural shifts in the U.S. commercial real estate market.

1 A revaluation of just-in-time supply chains

U.S.-based multinational corporations may reassess their supply chains, which could result in a reversion to manufacturing more critical products and components domestically. Companies are likely to revisit existing business continuity plans, too, particularly mission-critical back-office functions that have migrated overseas. Many executive teams may also elect to buffer their inventories, or double down on redundant capabilities. While a long-standing trend toward just-in-time delivery has helped reduce warehousing costs, it’s also left less margin for error along a far-flung global supply chain. The coronavirus pandemic has made the risks clearer: A disruption in a corporation’s supply chain can quickly lead to a disruption in its business as well.

If onshoring and more redundant operations take hold, industrial demand in certain U.S. markets could see a big boost. Manufacturers might be inclined to favor less expensive locales with more affordable labor. Inland markets, such as those near Chicago, Dallas, and Phoenix, for example, might outperform established coastal markets, such as those in northern New Jersey or Southern California’s Inland Empire. A relative shift in emphasis from coastal markets toward the middle of the country would likely represent a net positive for the U.S. industrial property segment as a whole, particularly big-box and modern warehouse complexes in established midwestern, southwestern, and southeastern logistics hubs with access to railways, interstate highways, and commercial air transportation.

2 An accelerating flight to e-commerce

While the migration to e-commerce from brick-and-mortar stores has been a long-standing trend, the recent conditions caused by the coronavirus pandemic may prove difficult or impossible for relatively weaker retailers to weather. Almost overnight, online shopping has become less of a convenience and more of a necessity for many of us, accelerating the growth of e-commerce’s share of the overall retail market. Many traditional retail properties may shutter and be repurposed; certain grocery-anchored shopping centers and experiential retail centers may hold up relatively well, but they’ll be forced to adapt. Grocery stores might become distribution hubs or be retrofitted to accommodate more direct delivery and curbside pickup. Again, this points to a net positive for industrial segments, both the big-box, modern warehouses and the last-mile, or last-touch, fulfillment centers near densely populated areas.

3 A reassessment of flexible work arrangements and density considerations

If history’s largest work-from-home experiment ultimately reveals that employees can be just as productive without leaving their homes, many employers might be more inclined to accommodate flexible arrangements that don’t require their staffers to commute into the office each day. Under such a scenario, we’d expect an increase in the use of business centers at apartment complexes and other multifamily properties, also creating new demand for unit types that have second bedrooms or dens that can serve as home offices.

This chart shows that the great work-from-home experiment seems relatively successful so far: In the Pension Real Estate Association survey of its 200 members, the vast majority the 192 respondents indicated that conducting business efficiently with employees working remotely resulted in no real issues or only some small effect; only 3% reported serious obstacles).

More flexible work arrangements could also reduce corporate office space requirements and, by extension, demand for downtown office properties. A potentially offsetting factor, the coronavirus crisis has drawn attention to health risks inherent in open and shared workspaces, which may cause some companies to revert to traditional enclosed office settings, which would actually increase per capita office space requirements, all else being equal. Moreover, certain benefits of in-person camaraderie just can’t be replicated remotely, and many firms will likely maintain traditional offices to maximize employee engagement and perpetuate the corporate culture.

Perhaps the more relevant question is, will population density drive big-city life and work beyond the pale? New York’s ongoing struggle to slow the spread of COVID-19 underscores the pitfalls of population density risk like no other event in modern memory. Many firms may think twice before maintaining a large presence in megacity centers; we may see more corporate headquarters migrate toward suburbia in the years ahead. Lingering public health concerns and changing cultural preferences may also drive residential tenants to less dense multifamily properties, favoring the suburban over the downtown, with increased demand for low- and mid-rise buildings over high-rise skyscrapers.

While some segments are better positioned than others, we expect to see major structural shifts in the way people perceive, use, and invest in virtually all property types.

Nimbleness has never been more important for real estate investors

While there’s so much we don’t know, we have to assume the implications for the commercial real estate industry will be substantial. While some segments are better positioned than others for the moment, we expect to see major structural shifts in the way people perceive, use, and invest in virtually all property types, with countless microshifts along the way. Real estate managers with narrow mandates and legacy portfolios might not be able to transact quickly enough for new and changing circumstances. As a result, strategies with more flexibility could be better positioned to take advantage of the structural shifts we see on the horizon.

 

 

 

 

1 The Black Death and the Transformation of the West, David Herlihy, 1997. 2 who.int/ith/diseases/sars/en/, 2020.

A widespread health crisis such as a global pandemic could cause substantial market volatility, exchange trading suspensions and closures, and affect portfolio performance. For example, the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has resulted in significant disruptions to global business activity. The impact of a health crisis and other epidemics and pandemics that may arise in the future, could affect the global economy in ways that cannot necessarily be foreseen at the present time. A health crisis may exacerbate other pre-existing political, social and economic risks. Any such impact could adversely affect the portfolio’s performance, resulting in losses to your investment

Investing involves risks, including the potential loss of principal. Financial markets are volatile and can fluctuate significantly in response to company, industry, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments.  These risks are magnified for investments made in emerging markets. Currency risk is the risk that fluctuations in exchange rates may adversely affect the value of a portfolio’s investments.

The information provided does not take into account the suitability, investment objectives, financial situation, or particular needs of any specific person. You should consider the suitability of any type of investment for your circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice.

This material, intended for the exclusive use by the recipients who are allowable to receive this document under the applicable laws and regulations of the relevant jurisdictions, was produced by, and the opinions expressed are those of, Manulife Investment Management as of the date of this publication, and are subject to change based on market and other conditions. The information and/or analysis contained in this material have been compiled or arrived at from sources believed to be reliable, but Manulife Investment Management does not make any representation as to their accuracy, correctness, usefulness, or completeness and does not accept liability for any loss arising from the use of the information and/or analysis contained. The information in this material may contain projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets, management discipline, or other expectations, and is only as current as of the date indicated. The information in this document, including statements concerning financial market trends, are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. Manulife Investment Management disclaims any responsibility to update such information.

Neither Manulife Investment Management or its affiliates, nor any of their directors, officers or employees shall assume any liability or responsibility for any direct or indirect loss or damage or any other consequence of any person acting or not acting in reliance on the information contained herein.  All overviews and commentary are intended to be general in nature and for current interest. While helpful, these overviews are no substitute for professional tax, investment or legal advice. Clients should seek professional advice for their particular situation. Neither Manulife, Manulife Investment Management, nor any of their affiliates or representatives is providing tax, investment or legal advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This material was prepared solely for informational purposes, does not constitute a recommendation, professional advice, an offer or an invitation by or on behalf of Manulife Investment Management to any person to buy or sell any security or adopt any investment strategy, and is no indication of trading intent in any fund or account managed by Manulife Investment Management. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. Diversification or asset allocation does not guarantee a profit nor protect against loss in any market. Unless otherwise specified, all data is sourced from Manulife Investment Management.

 

Manulife Investment Management

Manulife Investment Management is the global wealth and asset management segment of Manulife Financial Corporation. We draw on more than 150 years of financial stewardship to partner with clients across our institutional, retail, and retirement businesses globally. Our specialist approach to money management includes the highly differentiated strategies of our fixed-income, specialized equity, multi-asset solutions, and private markets teams—along with access to specialized, unaffiliated asset managers from around the world through our multimanager model.

These materials have not been reviewed by, are not registered with any securities or other regulatory authority, and may, where appropriate, be distributed by the following Manulife entities in their respective jurisdictions. Additional information about Manulife Investment Management may be found at www.manulifeim.com/institutional

Australia: Hancock Natural Resource Group Australasia Pty Limited., Manulife Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited. Brazil: Hancock Asset Management Brasil Ltda. Canada: Manulife Investment Management Limited, Manulife Investment Management Distributors Inc., Manulife Investment Management (North America) Limited, Manulife Investment Management Private Markets (Canada) Corp. China: Manulife Overseas Investment Fund Management (Shanghai) Limited Company. European Economic Area and United Kingdom: Manulife Investment Management (Europe) Ltdwhich is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct AuthorityManulife Investment Management (Ireland) Ltd. which is authorised and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland Hong Kong: Manulife Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited. Indonesia: PT Manulife Aset Manajemen Indonesia. Japan: Manulife Investment Management (Japan) Limited. Malaysia: Manulife Investment Management (M) Berhad (formerly known as Manulife Asset Management Services Berhad) 200801033087 (834424-U) Philippines: Manulife Asset Management and Trust Corporation. Singapore: Manulife Investment Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (Company Registration No. 200709952G) South Korea: Manulife Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited. Switzerland: Manulife IM (Switzerland) LLC. Taiwan: Manulife Investment Management (Taiwan) Co. Ltd. United States: John Hancock Investment Management LLC, Manulife Investment Management (US) LLC, Manulife Investment Management Private Markets (US) LLC and Hancock Natural Resource Group, Inc. Vietnam: Manulife Investment Fund Management (Vietnam) Company Limited.

Manulife Investment Management, the Stylized M Design, and Manulife Investment Management & Stylized M Design are trademarks of The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company and are used by it, and by its affiliates under license

513414

Matthew S. Warner

Matthew S. Warner , 

Portfolio Manager, Real Estate Equity

Manulife Investment Management

Read bio