Where we are in the credit cycle—and why we still have room to run

Key takeaways

  • Volatility is back in many segments of the bond market, but there’s no reason to think we’re heading toward a recession in the near future.
  • The risks to the corporate bond markets are mostly geopolitical in nature, rather than fundamental or macroeconomic.
  • Although we believe there’s still time left in the current expansion, we think there are steps investors can take today to adopt a more cautious stance, including being selective about where on the yield curve to invest and derive their interest-rate exposure, diversifying their portfolios internationally, and being mindful of liquidity risks.

Over the past year, fixed-income investors have become increasingly concerned with trying to assess where we are in the credit cycle and exactly how much longer the macroeconomic tailwinds for bonds can last. Investors are right to pose those questions. It’s been a decade since the end of the last recession, the stock market has set multiple all-time highs in recent months, and consumer confidence is back to prerecession highs. Meanwhile, the U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed) has for three years been normalizing monetary policy, and the yield curve today is as flat as it’s been in years. It’s an environment in which investors are becoming more concerned about a less attractive global growth outlook and rising market volatility, but does the data actually suggest there’s trouble on the horizon?

Understanding the anatomy of a typical credit cycle

Before we try to pinpoint where we are in the credit cycle, it’s worth unpacking exactly what that term means. The credit cycle is typically divided into four phases:

1 Expansion—companies are growing and often issuing new debt

2 Downturn—companies experience deteriorating fundamentals and defaults           increase

3 Repair—companies begin cutting costs and restructuring debt, if necessary

4 Recovery—companies are benefiting from improving economic conditions, but       remain conservative in their use of capital

The length of each part of the cycle varies. For example, the last downturn, during the 2007/2008 global financial crisis, was short, steep, and severe; the recovery, by contrast, was long and gradual. With that in mind, we believe the U.S. corporate debt market is clearly still in the expansion phase. But the bigger and more significant questions are: How late in the expansion are we? And how much longer can it last?

Infographic of credit cycle. The infographic basically shows that an expansion phase is typically marked by rising levels of leverage, increased merger and acquisition activity and easy access to capital. A downturn then follows, which is typically marked by peak leverage levels, deteriorating earnings and a spike in defaults. The repair phase then follows, which is typically marked by restructuring activity, and increased equity issuance. This is then followed by the recovery phase, which typically sees companies reporting rising cash flows and margins, with falling leverage leverages. This phase then leads back to the expansion phase and the cycle continues.

It’s an old adage that economic expansions don’t die of old age—and we don’t believe the current one is any exception. The unemployment rate in the United States is the lowest it’s been in half a century, top-line economic growth (as measured by GDP) has been solid and relatively steady, and corporate profits are generally quite strong. There are no truly systemic risks that threaten to cause the kind of global contagion we saw in 2007/2008. There are some very specific risks in the fixed-income market—securitized student loan debt, for example, or the ballooning size of the BBB-rated segment—but we don’t see a scenario that, in the short term, would lead to a significant downturn in the credit markets.

The risks to the markets are mostly political

The biggest risks to the current expansion—already among the longest on record—are primarily geopolitical, in our view. While the ongoing trade dispute between the United States and China has captured plenty of headlines, the tariffs themselves may not be the real threat. Estimates suggest the likely damage rising tariffs would inflict on economic activity in either country remains low. For the United States, total exports to China represent less than 1% of GDP; for China, if President Trump introduced tariffs on all U.S.-bound exports, the cost would be a 0.7% hit to its economy.¹

That said, the economic saber-rattling has, in our view, limited upside for either party—particularly given that the real risk to the United States is tied up in investors' perception of the trade situation. The stock market has been whipsawed in recent months as investors have tried to digest the latest stances coming out of Washington and Beijing, and a prolonged risk-off trade in equities could have a material effect on the real economy in the United States; it’s a risk that shouldn’t be discounted.

In Europe, Brexit remains an on-going source of uncertainty and market turmoil. British Prime Minister Theresa May resigned on June 7 after multiple failed attempts to gain backing in Parliament for the Brexit agreement she negotiated with the European Union. The situation is far too fluid to predict how it might ultimately pan out, but it’s safe to say that the uncertainty will likely bring with it patches of volatility as investors digest the latest developments.

Why we believe there’s still runway left for the expansion

Despite the risks, there are a number of compelling reasons to believe we’ve got time left in the expansionary phase of this credit cycle; we think three factors in particular are worth highlighting.


1 Spreads and defaults are relatively low

As a general rule, by the time bond defaults materially increase, economic expansions are already over. The better leading indicator of the health of the corporate debt market is spreads, or the incremental yield investors demand for taking on credit risk. Since the beginning of 2000, the average spread in the high-yield market has been 584 basis points (bps) (100bps equals 1%); today, the spread in that market is just 378bps.² Defaults, meanwhile, are also running below their long-term  average, which is 3.3% over the past 20 years. Last year, just 1.9% of the market defaulted, and this year we’re on pace for an estimated default rate of an even lower 1.5%.³

The takeaway here is that the risks investors perceive in the high-yield market—as reflected by spreads—remain quite low.

Chart of ICE Bank of America Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Master Index option adjusted spread. The chart shows that the index is still below the index average since 2000. Crucially, it's a long way below the highs the index hit during the global financial crisis.

2 The Fed is done tightening

The Fed has become significantly more dovish in recent months, which has been welcome news to the markets. After three years of rate increases, the Fed seems to have hit the pause button. Its own projections of future rate levels (which are to be taken with a generous dose of salt) have come down materially over the past year; as of June, the consensus market view seemed to suggest two, if not more, rate cuts by the end of 2020. The outlook for short-term rates matters because it affects both companies’ and individuals’ access to capital; when money is cheap and access is relatively easy, firms and households are both more likely to borrow and reinvest. A more conservative trajectory for rates makes this trend more likely to continue. Absent a full-blown trade war that pushes the economy into recession, however, the risk is that the market is currently pricing in too many cuts in the short term.

Federal Open Market Committee's dot plot chart of the as of May 19, 2019. The chart suggests Fed officials could be planning to pause rate hikes.

3 Balance sheets are strong

Stable and relatively low borrowing costs are particularly relevant in the context of today’s strong corporate and consumer balance sheets. Corporations remain less leveraged today than they’ve been for most of the past decade; consumers, meanwhile, aggressively deleveraged in the wake of the Great Recession and have remained cautious about taking on new debt. The point here is twofold. First, there hasn’t been any evidence of excessive risk-taking in the financial system that could become a catalyst for the next recession. Second, mild increases in risk appetites from either corporations or consumers—or both—could actually help extend the current expansion. As so often is the case, moderation is the key.

Chart mapping financial conditions leverage sub index against U.S. Household Debt Service Payments expressed as a percentage of  disposal income. Chart shows that as of May 31, 2019, both indicators were below 11%, significantly lower than what they were during the global financial crisis.

Factors to consider in the second half of 2019

If we’re ultimately in the late innings of the current expansion, but don’t foresee a recession or significant downturn over the next 12 months, the question still remains: How might investors take a more cautious stance in their portfolios without retreating to the sidelines? 

Be flexible with duration 

While the short end of the yield curve may be fairly stable over the near term, it’s anybody’s guess where yields on longer-dated securities are headed next. Our belief is that there are more forces working to push yields higher in the United States than there are lower, but that trend may take a significant amount of time to fully manifest itself. The point here is that taking big bets on the direction of long-term rates—especially through exposure to the U.S. Treasury market, the prices of which are driven primarily by investors’ views on rates—may not be a prudent strategy in today’s environment. The source of a portfolio’s duration, or interest-rate exposure, matters quite a bit; we believe a more attractive way to attain it is through allocations to investment-grade corporate bonds and foreign government debt, especially in markets with higher yields and fewer forces likely to push rates higher. 

Look overseas for opportunities to diversify 

While the U.S. bond market may be in the late stages of the expansion, other markets are in much earlier phases. Brazil, Colombia, and Indonesia, for example, are markets that are all showing signs of strengthening fundamentals, stable inflation, and improving political climates. Emerging markets—especially those where governments aren’t reliant on foreign capital to fund domestic operations—generally offer higher yields than U.S. Treasuries and, in the case of debt issued in local currencies, a meaningful potential way to diversify away from U.S. dollar-denominated debt. 

Be cognizant of liquidity risks

Liquidity is, too often, a characteristic investors don’t give a lot of thought to; we don’t tend to miss it until it’s gone. But in an environment where many investors are starting to take notice of where the exits are, having a strategy for managing liquidity is vital. Beyond general precautions around issue size and setting a cap on the percentage of assets invested in any one name, we’d suggest investors take a second look at their sector allocations. Frontier emerging markets and lower-quality high-yield corporate credits, for example, are areas of the market that could experience a lack of liquidity and higher price volatility as expectations for global growth and subsequent central bank policies change over time.



1 “Is a global recession looming?” Capital Economics, May 2019. 2 Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, as of May 31, 2019. 3 J.P. Morgan Default Monitor, May 1, 2019.

Investing involves risks, including the potential loss of principal. Financial markets are volatile and can fluctuate significantly in response to company, industry, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments. These risks are magnified for investments made in emerging markets. Currency risk is the risk that fluctuations in exchange rates may adversely affect the value of a portfolio’s investments.

The information provided does not take into account the suitability, investment objectives, financial situation, or particular needs of any specific person. You should consider the suitability of any type of investment for your circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice.

This material, intended for the exclusive use by the recipients who are allowed to receive this document under the applicable laws and regulations of the relevant jurisdictions, was produced by, and the opinions expressed are those of, Manulife Investment Management as of the date of this publication, and are subject to change based on market and other conditions. The information and/or analysis contained in this material has been compiled or arrived at from sources believed to be reliable, but Manulife Investment Management does not make any representation as to their accuracy, correctness, usefulness, or completeness and does not accept liability for any loss arising from the use of the information and/or analysis contained. The information in this material may contain projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets, management discipline, or other expectations, and is only as current as of the date indicated. The information in this document, including statements concerning financial market trends, are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. Manulife Investment Management disclaims any responsibility to update such information.

Neither Manulife Investment Management or its affiliates, nor any of their directors, officers, or employees, shall assume any liability or responsibility for any direct or indirect loss or damage or any other consequence of any person acting or not acting in reliance on the information contained herein. All overviews and commentary are intended to be general in nature and for current interest. While helpful, these overviews are no substitute for professional tax, investment or legal advice. Clients should seek professional advice for their particular situation. Neither Manulife, Manulife Investment Management, nor any of their affiliates or representatives is providing tax, investment, or legal advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

This material was prepared solely for informational purposes, does not constitute a recommendation, professional advice, an offer, or an invitation by or on behalf of Manulife Investment Management to any person to buy or sell any security or adopt any investment strategy, and is no indication of trading intent in any fund or account managed by Manulife Investment Management. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. Diversification or asset allocation does not guarantee a profit nor protect against loss in any market. Unless otherwise specified, all data is sourced from Manulife Investment Management.

Manulife Investment Management

Manulife Investment Management is the global wealth and asset management segment of Manulife Financial Corporation. We draw on more than 150 years of financial stewardship to partner with clients across our institutional, retail, and retirement businesses globally. Our specialist approach to money management includes the highly differentiated strategies of our fixed-income, specialized equity, multi-asset solutions, and private markets teams—along with access to specialized, unaffiliated asset managers from around the world through our multimanager model.

These materials have not been reviewed by, are not registered with any securities or other regulatory authority, and may, where appropriate, be distributed by the following Manulife entities in their respective jurisdictions. Additional information about Manulife Investment Management may be found at www.manulifeim.com/institutional.

Australia: Hancock Natural Resource Group Australasia Pty Limited, Manulife Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited. Brazil: Hancock Asset Management Brasil Ltda. Canada: Manulife Investment Management Limited, Manulife Investment Management Distributors Inc., Manulife Investment Management (North America) Limited, Manulife Investment Management Private Markets (Canada) Corp. China: Manulife Overseas Investment Fund Management (Shanghai) Limited Company. European Economic Area and United Kingdom: Manulife Investment Management (Europe) Ltd. which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, Manulife Investment Management (Ireland) Ltd. which is authorised and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland Hong Kong: Manulife Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited. Indonesia: PT Manulife Aset Manajemen Indonesia. Japan: Manulife Asset Management (Japan) Limited. Malaysia: Manulife Investment Management (M) Berhad (formerly known as Manulife Asset Management Services Berhad) 200801033087 (834424-U) Philippines: Manulife Asset Management and Trust Corporation. Singapore: Manulife Investment Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (Company Registration No. 200709952G) Switzerland: Manulife IM (Switzerland) LLC. Taiwan: Manulife Investment Management (Taiwan) Co. Ltd. Thailand: Manulife Asset Management (Thailand) Company Limited. United States: John Hancock Investment Management LLC, Manulife Investment Management (US) LLC, Hancock Capital Investment Management, LLC and Hancock Natural Resource Group, Inc. Vietnam: Manulife Investment Fund Management (Vietnam) Company Limited. 


Daniel S. Janis III

Daniel S. Janis III, 

Senior Portfolio Manager, Head of Global Multi-Sector Fixed Income

Manulife Investment Management

Read bio