Has China's economic recovery peaked?

Recent economic indicators suggest that the cyclical recovery in China might have plateaued. How might this affect financial markets and global growth prospects?

A rare spot of hope in a year marked by the pandemic

News that China’s economy expanded by 2.3% in 2020 injected much-needed cheer into the financial markets last month, making it the only major economy in the world that managed to post meaningful growth in a year marked by the COVID-19 outbreak. However, we believe the cyclical recovery in China may have peaked—the main drivers behind last year’s growth, massive monetary and fiscal stimulus, debt expansion, and an export boom, are in the midst of reversing course. We see downside risks to current consensus forecasts for Chinese GDP growth (which calls for an 8.4% year-over-year growth 2021 and a 5.5% expansion in 2022) and expect these forecasts to be downgraded in the coming months.¹

China’s policy approach: a recalibration

China signaled a relatively less supportive policy approach at its annual Central Economic Work Conference in December, aiming to target reasonable monetary policy and noted that the country’s fiscal plans should be sustainable over time. While the main thrust of the government’s communication remains consistent (i.e., no sharp policy U-turns and continued “necessary support for the recovery”)² for those of us who’ve been following China for a long time, the incremental shift in tone is obvious. And indeed, the latest economic data—from the credit impulse to Purchasing Managers’ Indexes (PMIs)—is beginning to reflect the recalibration in the government’s approach to policymaking.

The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) has reversed most of the monetary easing it had implemented in the past year. For instance, short-term interbank rates rose sharply in recent weeks, hitting levels not seen in five years. By deciding against providing additional liquidity to the market, the PBOC has effectively “endorsed” the rise in short-term interbank rates.³ In fact, the central bank has been, in net terms, withdrawing liquidity through its various monetary policy tools year to date, which could have negative implications for GDP growth. This shift in policy stance has already begun to weigh on credit growth, which has been slowing since November.

Mapping net liquidity level against monthly GDP tracker

AODA: Chart mapping net liquidity levels provided by the People’s Bank of China (three-month rolling sum, and advanced two quarters) against China’s monthly GDP estimate (on a year-over-year basis) from January 2008 to January 2021. The chart shows that net liquidity provided by the Chinese central bank has slipped into negative territory in recent months and the monthly GDP tracker is beginning to display signs of moderating in terms of growth.
Source: Bloomberg, Macrobond, Manulife Investment Management, as of February 17, 2021. LHS refers to left-hand side; RHS refers to right-hand side. YoY refers to year over year. 

We’re seeing similar developments on the fiscal front. In contrast to recent years, the central government hasn’t authorized advanced borrowing quotas for local governments ahead of the annual National People’s Congress session in March. Notably, in a departure from what it’s done in the last two years, authorities have yet to announce how much local governments can borrow from the bond market in 2021⁴—a sign of fiscal tightening. The absence of market activity is also telling: There hadn’t been any local government bond issuance in January 2021, compared with 418 billion yuan in January 2019⁵ and 785 billion yuan⁶ in January 2020. Meanwhile, policymakers have announced the rollback of many fiscal support policies; for example, social security waivers.⁷

Refocusing on reining in financial risks

Having put the deleveraging campaign on ice last year, China is now refocusing its attention on reining in financial risks—it’s an issue of growing urgency in light of existing debt levels, as debt-servicing costs have risen to record highs.

Assessing China's debt level and its debt-servicing ratio

Chart showing China’s total debt, expressed as a percentage share of GDP, and its various components: bank debt, government debt, household debt, and corporate debt from 2006 to February 3, 2020. Crucially, it also shows debt servicing ratio for the private nonfinancial sector. The chart shows that China’s debt level and debt servicing ratio has been rising again in the past year, after a brief dip in 2018.
Source: Bloomberg, Macrobond, Manulife Investment Management, as of February 17, 2021. LHS refers to left-hand side; RHS refers to right-hand side. YoY refers to year over year. Augmented government debt expands the perimeter of government debt to include government-managed funds and the activity of local government financing vehicles.

Beijing has taken a particularly tough stance toward the highly leveraged property sector, where authorities have introduced a string of regulatory controls to clamp down on excessive speculation, including demands for higher minimum down payments, placing limits on bank lending to the property sector, and incrementally tighter financing conditions for developers.⁸ Since the property sector is a key pillar of China’s economy, slower property investment represents another downside risk to GDP growth this year. 

Export boom unlikely to carry over through 2021

Coronavirus disruptions around the world fueled strong demand for Chinese goods in 2020, resulting in a string of record monthly trade surpluses in China, boosting GDP growth. Export strength was concentrated in personal protective equipment, electronics, furniture, and recreational goods for home use, filling gaps left by supply-and-demand imbalances from lockdowns abroad. Unsurprisingly, China’s share of world exports hit a record high in 2020.¹ Encouraging as it may be, we don’t expect China’s net exports to continue their winning streak. Put simply, a global economic reopening is likely to present a headwind to Chinese exports as these disruptions unwind.

"Taking into account all the available information, it’s logical to conclude that China’s economic recovery might have peaked and growth is likely to moderate."

Chinese manufacturing activity has reversed sharply with foreign demand now slowing as a result of pent-down demand, where one-time consumer purchases of durable goods/household appliances/home entertainment systems has hit a saturation point. We expect this trend to accelerate if vaccines prove successful, which would enable normalization in other major economies and therefore lead to increased global competition; or if we were to see a broadening in protectionist measures globally that could limit global demand for Chinese goods. Meanwhile, Chinese exporters are reeling from the strengthening Chinese yuan, which is trading at levels not seen since June 2018 against the U.S. dollar,1 as currency mismatches hurt their bottom line.⁹  

Taking into account all the available information, it’s logical to conclude that China’s economic recovery might have peaked and growth is likely to moderate. It’s true that the weeks ahead could yet yield some policy surprises; however, it’s likely that the news flow going forward may not be as positive as consensus expectations might suggest. 

1 Bloomberg, as of February 3, 2021. 2China Targets ‘Reasonable’ Monetary Policy as Economy Recovers,” BNNBloomberg, December 19, 2020. 3China's o/n repo highest since March 2015, busts PBOC corridor ceiling,” Reuters, January 29, 2021. 4No Sign of China’s Bond Quota as Government Looks to Curb Debt,” Bloomberg, January 13, 2021. 5China bond issuance reaches 3.2 trln yuan in January,” xinhuanet.com, February 23, 2019. 6Local gov't bonds worth 785 bln yuan issued in January,” xinhuanet.com, February 23, 2020. 7 cctv.com, December 10, 2020. 8 “Beijing turns the screws on China’s property sector,” Financial Times, January 26, 2021. 9 “A stronger RMB impacts China’s exporters,” cgtn.com, December 7, 2020.

A widespread health crisis such as a global pandemic could cause substantial market volatility, exchange-trading suspensions and closures, and affect portfolio performance. For example, the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has resulted in significant disruptions to global business activity. The impact of a health crisis and other epidemics and pandemics that may arise in the future, could affect the global economy in ways that cannot necessarily be foreseen at the present time. A health crisis may exacerbate other pre-existing political, social and economic risks. Any such impact could adversely affect the portfolio’s performance, resulting in losses to your investment.

Investing involves risks, including the potential loss of principal. Financial markets are volatile and can fluctuate significantly in response to company, industry, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments. These risks are magnified for investments made in emerging markets. Currency risk is the risk that fluctuations in exchange rates may adversely affect the value of a portfolio’s investments.

The information provided does not take into account the suitability, investment objectives, financial situation, or particular needs of any specific person. You should consider the suitability of any type of investment for your circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice.

This material, intended for the exclusive use by the recipients who are allowed to receive this document under the applicable laws and regulations of the relevant jurisdictions, was produced by, and the opinions expressed are those of, Manulife Investment Management as of the date of this publication, and are subject to change based on market and other conditions. The information and/or analysis contained in this material has been compiled or arrived at from sources believed to be reliable, but Manulife Investment Management does not make any representation as to their accuracy, correctness, usefulness, or completeness and does not accept liability for any loss arising from the use of the information and/or analysis contained. The information in this material may contain projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets, management discipline, or other expectations, and is only current as of the date indicated. The information in this document, including statements concerning financial market trends, are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. Manulife Investment Management disclaims any responsibility to update such information.

Neither Manulife Investment Management or its affiliates, nor any of their directors, officers or employees shall assume any liability or responsibility for any direct or indirect loss or damage or any other consequence of any person acting or not acting in reliance on the information contained here. All overviews and commentary are intended to be general in nature and for current interest. While helpful, these overviews are no substitute for professional tax, investment or legal advice. Clients should seek professional advice for their particular situation. Neither Manulife, Manulife Investment Management, nor any of their affiliates or representatives is providing tax, investment or legal advice. This material was prepared solely for informational purposes, does not constitute a recommendation, professional advice, an offer or an invitation by or on behalf of Manulife Investment Management to any person to buy or sell any security or adopt any investment strategy, and is no indication of trading intent in any fund or account managed by Manulife Investment Management. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. Diversification or asset allocation does not guarantee a profit or protect against the risk of loss in any market. Unless otherwise specified, all data is sourced from Manulife Investment Management. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Manulife Investment Management
Manulife Investment Management is the global wealth and asset management segment of Manulife Financial Corporation. We draw on more than a century of financial stewardship to partner with clients across our institutional, retail, and retirement businesses globally. Our specialist approach to money management includes the highly differentiated strategies of our fixed-income, specialized equity, multi-asset solutions, and private markets teams—along with access to specialized, unaffiliated asset managers from around the world through our multimanager model.

This material has not been reviewed by, is not registered with any securities or other regulatory authority, and may, where appropriate, be distributed by the following Manulife entities in their respective jurisdictions. Additional information about Manulife Investment Management may be found at manulifeim.com/institutional.

Australia: Hancock Natural Resource Group Australasia Pty Limited., Manulife Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited. Brazil: Hancock Asset Management Brasil Ltda. Canada: Manulife Investment Management Limited, Manulife Investment Management Distributors Inc., Manulife Investment Management (North America) Limited, Manulife Investment Management Private Markets (Canada) Corp. China: Manulife Overseas Investment Fund Management (Shanghai) Limited Company. European Economic Area Manulife Investment Management (Ireland) Ltd. which is authorised and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland Hong Kong: Manulife Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited. Indonesia: PT Manulife Aset Manajemen Indonesia. Japan: Manulife Investment Management (Japan) Limited. Malaysia: Manulife Investment Management (M) Berhad 200801033087 (834424-U) Philippines: Manulife Asset Management and Trust Corporation. Singapore: Manulife Investment Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (Company Registration No. 200709952G) South Korea: Manulife Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited. Switzerland: Manulife IM (Switzerland) LLC. Taiwan: Manulife Investment Management (Taiwan) Co. Ltd. United Kingdom: Manulife Investment Management (Europe) Ltd. which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority United States: John Hancock Investment Management LLC, Manulife Investment Management (US) LLC, Manulife Investment Management Private Markets (US) LLC and Hancock Natural Resource Group, Inc. Vietnam: Manulife Investment Fund Management (Vietnam) Company Limited.

Manulife Investment Management, the Stylized M Design, and Manulife Investment Management & Stylized M Design are trademarks of The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company and are used by it, and by its affiliates under license.



Sue Trinh

Sue Trinh, 

Senior Macro Strategist

Manulife Investment Management

Read bio