Canadian commercial real estate outlook: Healthy growth in 2018; multi-family still strong and stable performer

In recent years, institutional investors have taken an interest in and increased their exposure to multi-family real estate. Institutional investors are attracted to the sector’s ability to produce stronger and more stable income returns over time compared to other property types.

The main reason for this is that long-term vacancy rates have remained historically low (1%–3%) compared to other commercial real estate asset classes, which are subject to much wider swings over market cycles. Further, strong demand and limited supply have resulted in healthy market rent growth.

In fact, over the past 20 years, national multi-family rental rates have grown consistently at an annual rate of anywhere from 1% to 5%, or 3% on average annually. By contrast, over the same period, rent growth for other property types has been more volatile, sometimes even declining into periods of negative growth.¹ The data is clear: multi-family assets generate more stable operating income over the long term, while delivering a much higher total return per unit of risk¹ than other property types.

A number of factors involving supply and demand imbalance are responsible for the historical performance of this asset class. Lifestyle preferences, strong household formation, increased immigration and a more pressing need for affordable housing are all currently driving demand. Which in turn is impacted negatively by a challenging regulatory environment, and increasing land values  and construction costs. We believe these key market dynamics will support continued robust performance for this asset class over the medium term. 

Chart of Average market vacancy rate. The chart shows average vacancy rates of multi-family homes, offices, industrial buildings and retail spaces. As of third quarter of 2018, the vacany rate of multi-family homes stands at around 2% - the loewst of the group. Office space has consistently experienced the highest vacancy rate, which stood at 12% as of Q3 2018. That was followed by retail space, with a vacany rate of more than 6%, and industrial space, which came in at under 4%.
Chart of Total return per unit of risk from the period between 2000 and 2018, comparing returns per unit of risk among the four real estate asset types. Multi-family homes provided the most return per unit risk taken, followed by retail properties. Industrial space and office space were joint last among the four.

Undersupplied housing market

The current supply and demand imbalance affecting multi-family real estate is in large part due to housing supply shortages in recent years. As we see in the graph below, from 2012 to 2018, Canadian households increased in number by about 250,000 per year, outpacing housing starts of, on average, 200,000 per year. While factors affecting supply shortages differ from region to region, the planning approval process is seen as a major hindrance to supply expansion across all regions. The regulatory hurdles Canadian developers must overcome are well known, with the World Bank ranking Canada 63rd in the world for ease of obtaining building permits. Lengthy approval timelines are the main reason for this ranking, with the most straightforward projects taking an estimated 249 days for approval compared to 81 days in  the United States.³ This is supported by the Fraser Institute, which has determined that costly and challenging landuse regulations in Canada are the main culprit responsible for housing supply shortages and rising prices.⁴ We expect local governments will continue to grapple with and rectify these housing issues, but the nature of the problem does not lend itself to short-term solutions and we expect the imbalance to persist for the medium term.  

Chart of overall housing supply and demand. A component chart that compares housing starts for single and multiple-homes with household formation in the country. The chart shows that since mid 2011, total household formation has consistently outpaced housing starts, barring a brief dip in 2017.

Despite these challenges on the regulatory front, purpose-built multi-family starts have been increasing in recent years, with the number of units under construction in 2018 topping off at 59,000 – almost three times 2011 levels.⁵ Tight vacancies of 1% to 2% in most major markets, healthy rental rate growth and strong interest from institutional investors are key factors driving purpose-built rental construction growth. Although developers have been reluctant to launch purpose-built rental projects in the past given valuation differences between rental and condominium developments, rising rents and lower capitalization rates are closing the valuation gap in many markets. As a result, we expect to see continued growth in purpose-built rental construction, although we’re not expecting a surge in supply over current levels as the sector still faces zoning constraints, lengthy development approval timelines and increasing development levies. In addition, developers have to contend with rapidly appreciating land values as well as higher construction costs, making it more expensive to bring new product to market. Construction costs for apartment buildings have continued to rise above the rate of inflation, with Toronto, Vancouver and Ottawa all experiencing the greatest increase at 7%, according to Statistics Canada’s Building Construction Price Index (BCPI).⁶ Further, various rent control measures across provinces add another risk factor to rental housing pro-forma models. All of these factors suggest that developers will continue to be challenged in bringing new purpose-built rental product to market in the medium term.

Chart of Rental starts. The chart shows that rental starts has been consistently growing since the year 2000 and is expected to rise above 45,000 for all of 2018.
Chart of Overall rental vacancy by metropolitan area. The chart shows that as of December 2018, rental vancy is highest in Edmonton, followed by Calgray, then Montreal, Halifax and Ottawa. Rental vancy is lowest in Vancouver, followed by Toronto.

Demographics and lifestyle preferences—driving demand

With the fastest-growing population among G7 countries,⁷ it looks like Canada will not be putting the brakes on its healthy population growth rate of close to 1.0% for at least the next five years.⁸ This momentum is in large part due to immigration.⁷ Generally, the immigrant population is a strong demand driver for rental housing, with immigrants highly concentrated in major Canadian cities such as Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver, which together account for 56% of all recent immigrants.⁹ Accordingly, it’s no surprise that rental housing in most large cities has benefited from immigration. 

An increase in one-person households is another trend that is driving the demand for rental housing. Over the last 65 years, the percentage of one-person households has climbed dramatically from 7% to over 28%,¹⁰ and is now the most common type of household. Factors primarily responsible for this single-occupancy trend are an aging population, delayed couple formation, the growing participation of women in the labor force and a higher rate of separation.⁹  The economic situation and lifestyle of the one-person household are more conducive to renting than owning, so the vigorous growth in this demographic can only bode well for multi-family rental demand. 

The business intelligence firm Informa recently conducted a survey of renters, and the results indicated that lifestyle preferences are key to rental demand. A hassle-free lifestyle, moving flexibility and location are all cited in the survey as the top motivators for renting. Further, 34% of respondents cited a preference for purpose-built rentals because they offer more services and more secure tenure.

Chart of population growth. It shows that population growth in Canada has been gradually declining in the last few decades. As of the third quarter of 2018, population growth was just above 1%.
Chart of Percentage of one-person households. The chart shows that one-person households has been rising consistently since mid-1950s. As of 2016, one-person households has risen to over 28% of all households.

Home ownership affordability—shifting demand to rentals

Renting and buying are competing housing options. As home ownership affordability deteriorates, rental housing becomes the natural alternative. RBC recently reported that home ownership affordability is now at its worst level since 1990.¹¹ RBC’s housing affordability index measures the share of median income required to buy a home and reveals the national average is at 43% for condominiums as at Q2 2018. Home ownership is particularly challenging in Vancouver and Toronto, with the affordability index at 52% and 46%, respectively, for these two cities. The potential for interest rates to go up and tighter mortgage lending guidelines will only contribute to the affordability decline going forward.

Chart of Housing affordability, condo, national average. The index measures the share of median income required to buy a home, and shows that the share of income required to buy a home has been rising since 2014, and as of the third quarter of 2018, is at its worst level since 1990.
Chart of Housing affordability, condo, by metropolitan area. The chart shows that housing affordability is an issue in Vancouver and Toronto, where the median share of inome required to buy a house has risen to 52% and 48% respectively, as of the third quarter of 2018.

The demographic trends noted above, combined with affordability constraints, have seen home ownership rates drop by 1.2% between 2011 and 2016 (according to the two most recent census surveys). This is the first time they have dropped in 45 years. Younger age individuals, that are generally more financially constrained, are especially impacted with home ownership rates falling for 20 to 34 year-olds and 35 to 54 year-olds by 3.7% and 2.2%, respectively.

Conclusion

Multi-family real estate has proven to be an attractive asset class given its ability to improve portfolio risk- adjusted returns. We view this sector positively as supply and demand fundamentals continue to indicate an imbalance going forward. In summary, we believe that increasing immigration and household formation combined with a shift in lifestyle preferences and the growing need for affordable housing, pitted against a burdensome regulatory environment, land shortages and increasing construction costs, will curtail market equilibrium over the medium term. This bodes well for multi-family investors as these factors support strong market fundamentals and performance stability moving forward. Accordingly, we expect multi-family real estate will continue to be an important contributor to a diversified commercial real estate investment portfolio.

Healthy growth in 2018, but 2019 headwinds are getting stronger

Despite a slowdown in the fourth quarter, the Canadian economy finished the year showing healthy economic growth, with the increase in 2018 GDP expected to be in the range of 2.0% to 2.1%. However, decelerating household spending, persistently low oil prices, weak global trade and ongoing geopolitical uncertainties are weighing down the Canadian economic outlook, with 2019 growth forecast to be in the range of 1.7% to 1.9%.¹³

Household spending to come under pressure – While household spending has played an outsized role in economic growth over the past few years, a combination of weak wage growth, rising interest rates, high household debt and slower home price appreciation are all expected to temper growth in 2019. The Canadian economy added 163,300 jobs in 2018, a significant decline from the employment gains of 427,300 made a year earlier. The reduced employment gains are largely due to narrower workforce availability, with unemployment at a record low rate of 5.6%.¹⁴ Yet despite tight labour markets, wage growth has not increased and remains below the rate of inflation. Also, increasing interest rates will likely put a dent in household income and household discretionary spending. The wealth effect of a softer housing market and declines in the equity markets will be a further drag on household spending.

Non-energy investment and trade, the bright spot in the economy – Canadian business investment and trade in the non-energy sector is well positioned for stronger growth. Completion of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) has considerably reduced uncertainty for most businesses. Continuing US economic strength, particularly in industrial production, is fully supportive of stronger non-energy exports, which are also expected to benefit from a low Canadian dollar. This low-dollar environment will most likely prevail in the near term given interest rate differences and depressed oil prices.¹⁵ Even though recent data on business investment has been somewhat disappointing, the current environment is still supportive of increased activity. The Bank of Canada’s fourth quarter Business Outlook Survey shows a balance of increased investment, with 46% of firms expected to invest more compared to 21% expected to invest less in 2019.¹⁶

External risks becoming more pronounced – While rising interest rates and softer housing markets remain the primary downside risk factors for the Canadian economy, a global economic slowdown on the horizon is raising red flags. Ongoing trade tensions between the US and China, slower global growth, geopolitical uncertainties (e.g., Brexit), tighter financial markets, declining business confidence and the potential for a fiscal cliff in 2020 derailing US growth are all critical risk factors to monitor going forward.

Chart of employment growth. The chart shows that jobs created in the country in 2018 had fallen significantly from the previous year.
Chart of average weekly wage, annual growth, 12–month average. The chart shows that the average weekly wage, at an annualized rate, has started to fall slightly.

Real estate market Q4 review and outlook¹⁷

Chart of National investment volume and average cap rate, Q3 2018. The chart shows that as of the third quarter of 2018, Canada is on track to set a record for investment volume in the real estate market this year.

Investment market

Canada is almost certain to set a third consecutive quarterly record for investment volume in 2018: after a record-setting first half, investment in Canadian commercial real estate continued its pace in the third quarter with acquisition volumes totaling $11.9 billion. Total acquisitions for the first three quarters stood at $38.7 billion and, at that rate, full-year Canadian commercial real estate investment volume should approach the $50 billion mark for the first time. Major deals closing in the fourth quarter included: Queen’s Quay Terminal (office) in Toronto, which sold for $261 million; 1340-1360 Danforth Road (multi-family) in Toronto, which sold for $155 million; and Sun Life Plaza (office) in Calgary, which sold for $225 million. Investor appetite for industrial and multi-family assets has driven up investment volumes in 2018, with each of the assets benefiting from solid fundamentals and favorable overarching market dynamics. Overall, strong demand, healthy fundamentals and a fairly stable economic and political landscape all suggest a bright investment outlook for the sector going forward in 2019.

Chart of office market fundamentals, Q4 2018. The chart shows that vacancy rate for the office market has fallen to below 12%  as of the fourth quarter of 2018. Net absorption rate in 2018 was healthy, at above 8%.

Office market

The office market concluded the year on a high note as the overall vacancy rate compressed for the third consecutive quarter by 50 basis points (bps) to 11.9%, the lowest national vacancy rate in 13 quarters. Occupier demand continues to be fueled by maturing and new tech tenants, who comprise 22.7% of all tenants in the office market. There has been a significant concentration of tech firms targeting Toronto and Vancouver recently, with both cities recognized internationally for their tech capabilities. They are also able to offer well-established community support as well as easy access to high-quality tech talent. Favorable immigration policies and business incentives will help Canada retain its competitive position globally, which will further strengthen market fundamentals. Rising investor confidence, bolstered by robust tenant demand, with 7.1 million square feet (SF) of net absorption in 2018, has pushed the development pipeline to expand by 27.1% year-over-year to 14.2 million SF. As workplace requirements continue to evolve, new supply coming to the market will focus on creating unique experiences to attract and retain world-class tenants.

Industrial market

Industrial market fundamentals in Canada remained strong in 2018 as the country ended the year with a record low availability rate of 3.2% and a record high national average net rental rate of $7.72 per SF. Overall, year-end absorption totaled 31.6 million SF, far surpassing the new supply of 15.4 million SF. This marked the third consecutive year in which new construction has lagged demand at the national level. Historically, demand for industrial space highly correlates with the overall macroeconomic performance of the country – as the greater economy went, so too went the industrial sector. Over the past few years, however, this relationship has begun to shift, with industrial demand appearing to outstrip the greater economy. This relationship is complex and significant factors driving this recent disconnect have been the rise of ecommerce and the evolution of supply chains. While ecommerce penetration has made significant advances as of late, there remains significant room for additional industrial sector growth since the ecommerce adoption rate in Canada still lags other large markets such as the US and the UK. As consumer preferences shift and retailers and distributors increase their omnichannel operations across the country, the industrial sector will be increasingly driven by growth in demand for logistics, warehousing, and transportation space. These uses in fact accounted for 76.7% of the national industrial demand and this trend shows no sign of reverting to historical norms in the foreseeable future.

Chart of Net absorption vs. GDP growth. The chart shows conclusively that demand for industrial space has a high correlation with Canada's economic performance.

Retail market

Following the shuttering of the remaining Sears Canada locations in early January, retail turnover remained at the forefront of discussion in 2018 with seven retailers announcing their exit from the Canadian marketplace. These brands are from across all retail categories and totaled an estimated 880,900 SF of retail space, predominantly located within regional shopping malls. The list includes Town Shoes and Fluid Brands, parent company to home furnishing stores Bowring and Bombay & Co. Miniso also made news in December when its parent company filed for bankruptcy; however, they have since reached an interim agreement with the Canadian franchise to remain open. The Asian discount retailer first opened in 2 017 with plans to operate 500 stores across Canada, but is now anticipated to be significantly scaled back. A similar litany of closures followed the sudden departure of Target in 2015, with over 2.5 million SF of turnover, excluding Target. Overall, the retail sector showed weaker performance in 2018, with consumer confidence dropping seven times in 12 months and softer year-to-date core retail sales growth of 2.5% as of October 2018 – down from 5.1% for the same period last year. On a positive note, Canada welcomed 43 international brands to the market in 2018, on par with the five-year average.

Chart of Retail departures market impact, excluding anchor retailers. The chart maps retail store closures in terms of locations against the volume of retail space that was returned to asset owners.

Multifamily market

The Canadian multi-family market remained tight in 2018 as demand continued to outpace supply, precipitating a national vacancy rate drop of 50 basis points to 2.4%. Key to the tightening of the national market vacancy rate were the compressions noted in Calgary and Edmonton, with these cities beginning to trend back down towards pre-energy recession levels. Vancouver and Toronto remain the tightest purpose-built rental markets in Canada despite recent slight upticks in vacancy to 1.0% in Vancouver and 1.1% in Toronto. Turnover has also slowed across the country, further highlighting the highly competitive market conditions. Ontario in particular has seen a dramatic reduction in turnover, likely due to recently expanded rent control regulations. All of these factors contributed to average rents increasing across the country, driving the national average monthly rent up by 1.8% in 2018 to $1,125. As affordability becomes more and more a pressing issue, additional purpose-built development is needed to alleviate the pressure on current demand. However, rising land prices have forced purpose-built developers out of the downtown core in most major cities. Purpose-built developers have thus begun to turn toward intensification opportunities on existing holdings as this allows them to add supply without the upfront cost of new land.

Chart of 2018 Canadian multi-family vacancy rates. The chart shows that the vacancy rate for multi-family buildings are lowest in Vancouver, followed closely by Toronto.

1 Based on net rent series, starting in 2000. Source: CBRE, as of Q3 2018. 2 Return per unit of risk calculated as average annual return divided by standard deviation of annual returns. Source: Manulife Real Estate. 3 The World Bank, Ease of doing business index, as of December 2018. 4 The Impact of Land-Use Regulation on Housing Supply in Canada, Fraser Institute, July 2016. 5 CMHC, as of Q3 2018. 6 Statistics Canada, as of Q3 2018. 7 Statistics Canada, Average annual population growth rate among G20 and G7 countries, 2011 to 2016. 8 Conference Board of Canada, Winter 2019. 9 Statistics Canada, Census of Population, 2016. 10 Statistics Canada, Census of Population, 1951 to 2016, and National Household Survey. 11 RBC Economics, “Canadian housing affordability at worst level in nearly 30 years”, as of September 2018. 12 The RBC Housing Affordability Index Measures show the proportion of median pre-tax household income that would be required to service the cost of mortgage payments (principal and interest), property taxes, and utilities based on the median market price. 13 Range of GDP forecast based on published data by RBC, CIBC, BMO, TD Bank, Scotiabank, and the Conference Board of Canada, as of December 2018. 14 Source: Statistics Canada, as of January 4, 2019. 15 RBC Economics, as of Q4 2018. 16 Bank of Canada Business Outlook Survey, Winter 2018. 17 CBRE Research, Q4 2018.

Information in this document may be sourced from Real Capital Analytics. ©2019 Real Capital Analytics, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Investing involves risks, including the potential loss of principal. Financial markets are volatile and can fluctuate significantly in response to company, industry, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments. These risks are magnified for investments made in emerging markets. Currency risk is the risk that fluctuations in exchange rates may adversely affect the value of a portfolio’s investments.

The information provided does not take into account the suitability, investment objectives, financial situation, or particular needs of any specific person. You should consider the suitability of any type of investment for your circumstances and, if necessary, seek professional advice.

This material, intended for the exclusive use by the recipients who are allowable to receive this document under the applicable laws and regulations of the relevant jurisdictions, was produced by, and the opinions expressed are those of, Manulife Asset Management as of the date of this publication, and are subject to change based on market and other conditions.

The information and/or analysis contained in this material have been compiled or arrived at from sources believed to be reliable, but Manulife Asset Management does not make any representation as to their accuracy, correctness, usefulness, or completeness and does not accept liability for any loss arising from the use of the information and/or analysis contained. The information in this material may contain projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets, management discipline, or other expectations, and is only as

current as of the date indicated. The information in this document, including statements concerning financial market trends, are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. Manulife Asset Management disclaims any responsibility to update such information.

Neither Manulife Asset Management or its affiliates, nor any of their directors, officers or employees shall assume any liability or responsibility for any direct or indirect loss or damage or any other consequence of any person acting or not acting in reliance on the information contained herein. All overviews and commentary are intended to be general in nature and for current interest. While helpful, these overviews are no substitute for professional tax, investment or legal advice. Clients should seek professional advice for their particular situation. Neither Manulife, Manulife Asset Management™, nor any of their affiliates or representatives is providing tax, investment or legal advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This material was prepared solely for informational purposes, does not constitute a recommendation, professional advice, an offer or an invitation by or on behalf of Manulife Asset Management to any person to buy or sell any security or adopt any investment strategy, and is no indication of trading intent in any fund or account managed by Manulife Asset Management. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. Unless otherwise specified, all data is sourced from Manulife Asset Management.

Manulife Investment Management

Manulife Investment Management is the global wealth and asset management segment of Manulife Financial Corporation. We draw on more than 150 years of financial stewardship to partner with clients across our institutional, retail, and retirement businesses globally. Our specialist approach to money management includes the highly differentiated strategies of our fixed-income, specialized equity, multi-asset solutions, and private markets teams—along with access to specialized, unaffiliated asset managers from around the world through our multimanager model.

These materials have not been reviewed by, are not registered with any securities or other regulatory authority, and may, where appropriate, be distributed by the following Manulife entities in their respective jurisdictions. Additional information about Manulife Investment Management may be found at www.manulifeim.com/institutional.

Australia: Hancock Natural Resource Group Australasia Pty Limited, Manulife Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited. Brazil: Hancock Asset Management Brasil Ltda. Canada: Manulife Investment Management Limited, Manulife Investment Management Distributors Inc., Manulife Investment Management (North America) Limited, Manulife Investment Management Private Markets (Canada) Corp. China: Manulife Overseas Investment Fund Management (Shanghai) Limited Company. European Economic Area and United Kingdom: Manulife Investment Management (Europe) Ltd. which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, Manulife Investment Management (Ireland) Ltd. which is authorised and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland Hong Kong: Manulife Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited. Indonesia: PT Manulife Aset Manajemen Indonesia. Japan: Manulife Asset Management (Japan) Limited. Malaysia: Manulife Investment Management (M) Berhad (formerly known as Manulife Asset Management Services Berhad) 200801033087 (834424-U) Philippines: Manulife Asset Management and Trust Corporation. Singapore: Manulife Investment Management (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (Company Registration No. 200709952G) Switzerland: Manulife IM (Switzerland) LLC. Taiwan: Manulife Investment Management (Taiwan) Co. Ltd. Thailand: Manulife Asset Management (Thailand) Company Limited. United States: John Hancock Investment Management LLC, Manulife Investment Management (US) LLC, Hancock Capital Investment Management, LLC and Hancock Natural Resource Group, Inc. Vietnam: Manulife Investment Fund Management (Vietnam) Company Limited. 

484346

William McPadden, CPA

William McPadden, CPA, 

Global Head of Real Estate

Manulife Investment Management

Read bio
Matthew Morano

Matthew Morano , 

Portfolio Manager, Real Estate Equity

Manulife Investment Management

Read bio
Greg Spafford

Greg Spafford, 

Senior Portfolio Manager, Real Estate Equity

Manulife Investment Management

Read bio
Matthew S. Warner

Matthew S. Warner , 

Portfolio Manager, Real Estate Equity

Manulife Investment Management

Read bio
Greg Wood

Greg Wood, 

Global Head of Real Estate Debt, Real Estate Equity

Manulife Investment Management

Read bio