It’s just bad timing, that’s all

Patience is not passive; on the contrary, it is concentrated strength.

— Bruce Lee

Over the past year, we have identified the weaker global manufacturing environment as a source of earnings risk and, therefore, equity market risk. Along the way we have been presented with the counter-argument of “yes, but we are starting to see signs of a bottoming.” Or, the other argument from a year ago, “the China recovery is a Q1 (2019) story,” which became a “Q2 story,” followed quickly by a “Q3 story”. All the while, the predicted recovery never quite materialized as advertised. And then just as we were starting to see nascent signs of a modest rebound of manufacturing activity in December, news of the coronavirus broke. Efforts to contain the spread of the virus will effectively stunt GDP growth for the first half of 2020 in China, with some secondary effects felt around the world. While global manufacturing seemed to have truly bottomed in the fourth quarter and started to improve according to the most recent surveys conducted by IHS Markit, a more meaningful recovery will no doubt be delayed for at least a quarter.

The January JP Morgan Global Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) came in at 50.4, the third straight month of expansion (a reading greater than 50 indicates expansion) and its strongest reading since March 2019. The number of countries with monthly PMI increases versus declines in January is the strongest since November 2017. Despite reaching a ten-month high, the latest reading is still modest by historical standards. The rise, nevertheless, hints that the global slowdown potentially bottomed out late last year.

This chart shows the JP Morgan Global Purchasing Managers Index compared to Global GDP, advanced three months, since 2011. The purchasing managers index (PMI) is a good indicator for global GDP three months ahead. Following a recent drop in PMI and subsequent slowdown in global economic growth, the PMI has reversed course and is now above 50, indicating expansion. This would suggest that global GDP growth has likely bottomed and could be picking up in the few quarters.

While the data looks positive, the story is not the same in all regions. In Asia, five out of seven countries saw declines in January from the month prior. The slowdown may be likely due to the shutdown for the Lunar New Year; however, we can reliably say that the February data will show an additional deceleration of manufacturing activity as a result of the coronavirus.

Similarly, the Eurozone activity seemed to have bottomed in September of last year, and though it has improved, the manufacturing index remains below the breakeven level of 50, at 47.9, and given its strong trade dependency with China, it is unlikely to escape the after-effects of China’s efforts to contain the virus.  Meanwhile, the US showed some signs of moderating growth following a rebound late last year. Here too, we do not expect the US will be completely isolated from a slowdown in China.

This chart shows the Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) for the US, Eurozone and China), since 2015. In all three cases, following slowdowns that began in mid-2018 through most of 2019, they have started to improve. While the Eurozone is still below 50, indicating contraction, the US and China are above 50, indicating expansion. The US and China has slowed more recently but remain in expansion.

While our team follows the IHS Markit surveys to get a better picture of the relative global landscape, we look to another organization, the Institute for Supply Management (ISM), to get a read on the US specifically and expected earnings growth. While the ISM survey is slightly different than Markit, the idea remains the same as an indication on the direction of the overall manufacturing economy and, subsequently, earnings growth.

This chart shows the Institute for Supply Management’s Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) relative to S&P 500 earnings growth, advanced 6 months. The PMI is a good predictor of earnings growth in six months. Following a deceleration in PMI since mid-2018 and recently falling below 50, indicating contraction, the PMI has jumped back above 50, at 50.9, indicating expansion. S&P 500 earnings growth followed the same direction as it was decelerating for all of last year. The most recent reversal in PMI would suggest that earnings growth may bottom in the first half of 2020 and then rebound in the second half, but will only be modestly positive.

The ISM Manufacturing PMI saw a sharp rebound in January, returning to expansion territory for the first time since July 2019. Nine of the ten components of the manufacturing index saw an improvement over the prior month. At current levels, the PMI would imply low to negative earnings growth on a year-over-year basis for the S&P 500 Index into the first half of 2020 followed by a modest rebound in the second half. However, we would expect that the coronavirus will have some negative impact on first quarter earnings for the S&P 500. At the end of 2018, according to S&P Global, Asia accounted for 8.24% of sales for the S&P 500 Index constituents, the highest of any region.

The impact of the coronavirus on manufacturing and services and the knock-on effect to earnings will be something we will be following closely over the next few months. Our main examination will be the degree and length of the disruption that this epidemic has caused and to what level corporate fundamentals have been affected. Given the recent strength it would appear that the equity markets are brushing off the coronavirus and its potential impact on corporate activity as a non-factor. While we are not as confident as equity investors would appear, we would also caution against an overreaction in either direction, be it overly bullish or bearish. When it comes to exogenous shocks such as this, we need some level of patience as we refocus and let the fundamentals dictate our actions. To that end, while we anticipate the effects of the coronavirus containment will wane through the second quarter and rebound in the back half of the year, given current equity market valuation and the headwinds facing earnings growth, we continue to emphasize a modest underweight to equities in favour of the downside protection fixed income traditionally provides.

Philip Petursson, CIM
Chief Investment Strategist

Kevin Headland, CIM
Senior Investment Strategist, Manulife Investment Management

A rise in interest rates typically causes bond prices to fall. The longer the average maturity of the bonds held by a fund, the more sensitive a fund is likely to be to interest-rate changes. The yield earned by a fund will vary with changes in interest rates.

Currency risk is the risk that fluctuations in exchange rates may adversely affect the value of a fund’s investments.

The opinions expressed are those of Manulife Investment Management as of the date of this publication, and are subject to change based on market and other conditions. The information and/or analysis contained in this material have been compiled or arrived at from sources believed to be reliable but Manulife Investment Management does not make any representation as to their accuracy, correctness, usefulness or completeness and does not accept liability for any loss arising from the use hereof or the information and/or analysis contained herein. Manulife Investment Management disclaims any responsibility to update such information. Neither Manulife Investment Management or its affiliates, nor any of their directors, officers or employees shall assume any liability or responsibility for any direct or indirect loss or damage or any other consequence of any person acting or not acting in reliance on the information contained herein.

All overviews and commentary are intended to be general in nature and for current interest. While helpful, these overviews are no substitute for professional tax, investment or legal advice. Clients should seek professional advice for their particular situation. Neither Manulife, Manulife Investment Management Limited, Manulife Investment Management, nor any of their affiliates or representatives is providing tax, investment or legal advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This material was prepared solely for informational purposes, does not constitute an offer or an invitation by or on behalf of Manulife Investment Management to any person to buy or sell any security and is no indication of trading intent in any fund or account managed by Manulife Investment Management. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. Unless otherwise specified, all data is sourced from Manulife Investment Management.

Manulife, Stylized M Design, and Manulife Investment Management & Design are trademarks of The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company and are used by it, and its affiliates under license.

Philip Petursson

Philip Petursson, 

Chief Investment Strategist and Head of Capital Markets Research

Manulife Investment Management

Read bio
Kevin Headland

Kevin Headland, 

Senior Investment Strategist

Manulife Investment Management

Read bio