A brighter 2024 outlook for U.S. regional banks as rates and deposit costs change course

With interest rates appearing to have peaked and lenders’ deposit costs easing, 2024 could turn out to be a far more hospitable year for U.S. regional banks than 2023.

For U.S. regional banks, 2023 was a tumultuous year. The failures in March and April of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and First Republic Bank weighed on regional banks’ stock prices through the spring and into the summer. These failures focused customers' attention on their deposits at other institutions that were financially sound, which led to accelerated upward deposit re-pricing activity. This deposit repricing weighed on banks’ bottom lines, leading investors to fret about the durability of bank deposit bases and the magnitude of further deposit repricing in an environment of elevated interest rates.    

But now that 2023 is behind us, we’re starting to see greater clarity on deposit costs. This has improved investor sentiment for U.S. regional bank stocks as a whole and sets the stage for net interest revenue to trend higher in 2024 and beyond, in our view.

The Fed’s pivot on rates provides a positive catalyst

Since last summer, bank management teams have consistently tried to convey the message that deposit repricing had been decelerating. That said, the market didn’t seem to believe this was the case, based on the continued struggle of many bank stocks to regain ground lost months earlier amid what turned out to be a brief and quickly contained surge in bank failures. However, this negative sentiment recently shifted as it became more apparent that the aggressive rate-hiking cycle begun by the U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed) in March 2022 had peaked and probably ended. The Fed’s so-called pivot came at its December 2023 meeting, when slowing inflation led Chair Jerome Powell to emphasize the growing likelihood of rate cuts in 2024. As we’ve noted, bank stocks have historically outperformed in the 12 months following the last Fed rate hike.1

The plateauing of deposit costs is very powerful for banks, in our view. Deposits are effectively a bank’s costs of goods sold—an accounting term defined as the total amount a business pays to sell a product or service. As banks’ costs of goods sold peak in a normalized interest-rate environment, many institutions still have an opportunity to continue to raise the price of the “goods”—in the case of banks, the increased rates that institutions can charge on loans and the higher income that banks may earn from investment portfolios.

We believe that this ability to generate more income in a normalized rate environment relative to a low-rate regime creates a favorable dynamic for bank revenue as we move through 2024 and beyond.

When the Fed raised rates beginning in early 2022, banks benefited in the short term, as loans tied to industry benchmark lending rates such as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate repriced to pay banks higher rates almost immediately.2 At the same time, the eventual rise in banks’ deposit costs lagged; however, this situation reversed in early 2023 as deposit repricing exceeded loan repricing across the banking sector. Now that the Fed appears to have reached peak rate levels, we expect that loan and security repricing is likely to recapture the lead from deposit repricing at many banks in 2024.

Bank profitability metrics became more favorable after rates began rising

Banking industry’s quarterly net interest margin (left axis) and net interest income (right axis), January 2010–October 2023 (%) 

This bar chart shows how U.S. banks' profitability metrics became more favorable after interest rates began rising in early 2022, leading to rising net interest margins and net interest income. This bar chart shows how U.S. banks' profitability metrics became more favorable after interest rates began rising in early 2022, leading to rising net interest margins and net interest income.

Source: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 2023. Net interest income is the revenue a bank earns from its interest-bearing assets minus expenses from paying interest to depositors. A bank’s net interest margin is an indicator of a bank’s profitability potential over the long term, calculated by dividing net interest income from average earning assets. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

A long-term catalyst: repricing of holdings dating to the near-zero rate environment

According to the CME FedWatch Tool as of January 12, 2024, there was a 81.2% probability of a rate cut in March and a 99.6% probability of a rate cut in May, as implied by 30-day Fed funds futures pricing data.3 These probabilities fluctuate day to day with changing market conditions; for example, as recently as December 15, 2023, the probability of a March cut was 69.5%; for a May cut, the probability was 94.7%. In our view, the timing of a rate cut is less important than the fact that the Fed is unlikely to return to a near-zero rate policy again in the near term. This marks a fundamental change from the period that followed the 2007–2009 global financial crisis, and we believe this shift will benefit banks over the long term. As we look past 2024, banks will still hold fixed-rate loans and securities that were originated and purchased during the near-zero rate environment. These holdings will reprice in the higher/normalized rate environment—a continued “goods” repricing that we believe is likely to provide a long-term tailwind to bank revenue. Bank management teams have only recently begun to discuss this longer-term tailwind, and we believe it’s underappreciated by bank investors. We believe that most banks are likely to produce record net interest income in 2025 as “goods” continue to reprice higher.

U.S. regional banks appear well positioned to absorb commercial real estate losses

In addition to the failures of a few institutions, persistent credit fears also weighed on bank stocks in 2023. Specifically, the market worried about regional banks’ perceived exposure to commercial real estate (CRE), including premier downtown properties struggling with a postpandemic rise in vacancies owing in part to increased remote work arrangements; however, these fears failed to recognize that the majority of regional banks’ CRE exposure is within the multifamily, suburban office, industrial, hospitality, medical, and retail categories, based on our proprietary research.

We continue to believe this concern is excessive, as underwriting standards have vastly improved since the global financial crisis. While we do expect some losses attributable to commercial real estate, banks’ exposure to the most troubled office towers in central business districts is limited. In addition, banks have been actively monitoring these property portfolios and have built specific loan loss reserves against this loan category. We regularly talk to bank management teams about their office exposure and they appear to us to remain comfortable with underwriting standards, levels of exposure, and loan loss reserves. Moreover, most banks have increased disclosure regarding their office loans to alleviate investor concern. For example, a regional bank with a $5.5 billion market capitalization recently disclosed that the weighted average loan to value on its portfolio was 58% and the average office loan was $2.7 million. From our experience, this is typical of regional banks, where most office exposure is to smaller buildings versus central business district office towers. While some one-off losses are likely to arise, we believe this isn’t a systemic issue.

As for banks’ overall ability to absorb credit losses of all types, loss levels have recently normalized from multi-year lows reached during the pandemic; however, we haven’t seen a deterioration in credit that would cause concern. In addition, the industrywide ratio of bank loan loss reserves to loans has recently increased, which provides protection against potential future loan losses. 

Banks continue to maintain robust reserves to absorb credit losses

U.S. banks' quarterly ratios of total loan loss reserves to total loans and annualized net charge-offs to total loans, January 2001–October 2023 (%)

This chart shows normalization following the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic of U.S. banks' ratios of total loan loss reserves to total loans and annualized net charge-offs to total loans. This chart shows normalization following the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic of U.S. banks' ratios of total loan loss reserves to total loans and annualized net charge-offs to total loans.

Source: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 2023. Recession periods indicated are as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Banks’ funding advantage has returned

As 2024 unfolds, we believe that regional bank shareholders are likely to finally realize some benefits from banks’ most valuable assets—their low-cost core deposit bases. During the period of near-zero rate policies, banks lacked a significant funding cost advantage versus nonbank competitors such as nonbank mortgage lenders, commercial lenders, and consumer finance companies. With the Fed moving away from the zero-rate floor, banks’ funding cost advantage has returned. We believe that this competitive advantage had become hidden to bank investors as deposit rates climbed faster than loan yields in early 2023; however, with the Fed seemingly at or near its peak-rate level, deposit costs have recently begun to plateau. We expect that this will drive most banks’ net interest revenue higher through 2024, bolstering investor sentiment.

Despite recent improvement in bank stocks, we believe that a significant disconnect remains between the fundamental performance of banks today and valuations in the market. As of December 29, 2023, the S&P Composite 1500 Banks Index was trading at a price-to-earnings multiple of 10.6x based on what we view as conservative consensus earnings estimates.4 This figure was significantly below its historical discount relative to the S&P 500 Index dating to the mid-1990s.5 On a price-to-book basis, banks were trading at 1.07x—also well below the index’s historical discount.3,4  While we expect there is likely to be some continued volatility, historically, periods like these have been an attractive entry point for investors, in our view. 



1 Source: Morningstar Direct. Following the ending dates of the past four U.S. Federal Reserve rate-hiking cycles on 2/1/95, 5/16/00, 6/29/06, and 12/19/18, the average total returns over the four subsequent 12-month periods were 29.97% for the S&P Composite 1500 Banks Index, 19.67% for the S&P 500 Index, and 18.38% for the Russell 2000 Index. The S&P 500 Index tracks the performance of 500 of the largest publicly traded companies in the United States. The Russell 2000 Index tracks the performance of 2,000 small-cap companies in the United States. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Past performance does not guarantee future results. 2 Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) is a secured overnight interest rate. SOFR is a reference rate; a rate used by parties in commercial contracts that is outside their direct control. SOFR uses actual costs of transactions in the overnight repo market, calculated by the New York Federal Reserve with U.S. government bonds serving as collateral for borrowing. 3 CME FedWatch Tool, as of 1/2/24. 4 FactSet, as of 12/29/23. The S&P Composite 1500 Index tracks the performance of 1,500 publicly traded large-, mid-, and small-cap companies in the United States. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. 5 FactSet, as of 12/29/23, for the S&P 500 Index relative to its average dating to 12/31/94.

The S&P 500 Index tracks the performance of the largest publicly traded companies in the United States. The S&P Composite 1500 Banks Index tracks the performance of publicly traded large- and mid-cap banking companies in the United States. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Investing involves risks, including the potential loss of principal. Financial markets are volatile and can fluctuate significantly in response to company, industry, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments. The information provided does not take into account the suitability, investment objectives, financial situation, or particular needs of any specific person.

All overviews and commentary are intended to be general in nature and for current interest. While helpful, these overviews are no substitute for professional tax, investment or legal advice. Clients and prospects should seek professional advice for their particular situation. Neither Manulife Investment Management, nor any of its affiliates or representatives (collectively “Manulife Investment Management”) is providing tax, investment or legal advice.

This material is intended for the exclusive use of recipients in jurisdictions who are allowed to receive the material under their applicable law. The opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and are subject to change without notice. Our investment teams may hold different views and make different investment decisions. These opinions may not necessarily reflect the views of Manulife Investment Management. The information and/or analysis contained in this material has been compiled or arrived at from sources believed to be reliable, but Manulife Investment Management does not make any representation as to their accuracy, correctness, usefulness, or completeness and does not accept liability for any loss arising from the use of the information and/or analysis contained. The information in this material may contain projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events, targets, management discipline, or other expectations, and is only current as of the date indicated. The information in this document, including statements concerning financial market trends, are based on current market conditions, which will fluctuate and may be superseded by subsequent market events or for other reasons. Manulife Investment Management disclaims any responsibility to update such information.

Manulife Investment Management shall not assume any liability or responsibility for any direct or indirect loss or damage or any other consequence of any person acting or not acting in reliance on the information contained here. This material was prepared solely for informational purposes, does not constitute a recommendation, professional advice, an offer or an invitation by or on behalf of Manulife Investment Management to any person to buy or sell any security or adopt any investment approach, and is no indication of trading intent in any fund or account managed by Manulife Investment Management. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. Diversification or asset allocation doesn’t guarantee a profit or protect against the risk of loss in any market. Unless otherwise specified, all data is sourced from Manulife Investment Management. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

This material has not been reviewed by, and is not registered with, any securities or other regulatory authority, and may, where appropriate, be distributed by Manulife Investment Management and its subsidiaries and affiliates, which includes the John Hancock Investment Management brand. Copyright 2024 by Manulife Investment Management. Manulife Securities and/or Manulife Private Wealth are using with permission. The statements and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author. Manulife Securities and/ or Manulife Private Wealth cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any statements or data.

Manulife, Manulife Investment Management, Stylized M Design, and Manulife Investment Management & Stylized M Design are trademarks of The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company and are used by it, and by its affiliates under license.


Susan A. Curry

Susan A. Curry, 

Senior Portfolio Manager, Capital Appreciation

Manulife Investment Management

Read bio
Ryan P. Lentell, CFA

Ryan P. Lentell, CFA, 

Portfolio Manager, Capital Appreciation

Manulife Investment Management

Read bio