News & Views
Canadian residents are required to file Form T1135 with their tax return when the total cost of all specified foreign property is $100,000 or more during the year. Failure to do so can lead to late penalties of $25 a day up to a maximum of $2,500. What happens if a taxpayer realizes they should have been filing the T1135 and voluntarily comes clean to Canada Revenue Agency (CRA)? A recent court case1 may provide an answer.
In that case, the taxpayer, Scott Moore worked for GE Capital from 2003 to 2016. He participated in the employer sponsored share purchase plan to acquire shares of GE Canada’s parent which was a publicly traded U.S. corporation. He made bi-weekly contributions which were matched by GE Canada.
In March 2016, GE Capital Canada was acquired by Wells Fargo Canada and this ended Mr. Moore’s participation in his employer sponsored share purchase plan. He then chose to transfer his shares to a Canadian brokerage account.
It was at this time that he realized he should have started filing a T1135 form in 2015. Shortly after his 2016 tax return filing due date, he wrote to CRA informing them of this and completed T1135 forms for both 2015 and 2016. He has continued to file T1135s annually as required. CRA assessed the maximum $2,500 penalty for filing his 2015 form late.
Mr. Moore reported all dividends received on his shares up to that time on his tax returns. There is no indication that any employment benefit was not also properly reported. Further, no amount was misrepresented, mischaracterized or omitted in his 2015 tax return.
To demonstrate the ambiguity of T1135 compliance, Mr. Moore submitted blank copies of the 2015 tax return and Income Tax Guide for review. The 2015 tax return asks if specified foreign property was owned at any time in the year where the total cost was more than $100,000. It then refers to the Guide for more information on foreign property.
In the 2015 Guide, the table of contents does not have a heading for “specified foreign property”. Instead, it has one for “Foreign Income” and that is where more information about specified foreign property can be found. This is odd given that the filing requirement for ownership of specified foreign property is not income-driven, nor does it matter if income is ever generated.
The additional information on specified foreign property in the Guide is under the sub-heading “Specified Foreign Property.” It consists of very little information other than a reference to the form itself and then identifying several properties that are not specified foreign property. Following that there is a further sub-sub-heading titled “Shares of a Non-Resident Corporation” which says that if you hold 10 percent or more of the shares of a non-resident corporation you may have to complete a T1134. It literally says nothing about a T1135 form.
While Mr. Moore voluntarily disclosed his late filing to CRA, he was unaware that this should have been done under CRA’s formal Voluntary Disclosure Program if he wanted to avoid coming to Court. Nonetheless, the judge ruled that the due diligence defense was appropriate in this case and waived all penalties.
In his decision, Justice Boyle pondered the odds of this appeal being before his Court had Mr. Moore taken a less honest approach and started filing his T1135 in 2016, not alerting CRA to the fact the $100,000 threshold was triggered in 2015.
As a final observation, Justice Boyle asks the rhetorical question, “Is Mr. Moore’s disclosure to CRA on a voluntary basis of his failure to file a 2015 information return not the type of compliance effort CRA wants to encourage Canadians to follow?” Clearly the Court answered this in the affirmative.
1 Moore v The Queen, 2019 TCC 141
This communication is published by Manulife Investment Management. Any commentaries and information contained in this communication are provided as a general source of information only and should not be considered personal investment, tax, accounting or legal advice and should not be relied upon in that regard. Professional advisors should be consulted prior to acting based on the information contained in this communication to ensure that any action taken with respect to this information is appropriate to their specific situation. Facts and data provided by Manulife Investment Management and other sources are believed to be reliable as at the date of publication.
Certain statements contained in this communication are based, in whole or in part, on information provided by third parties and Manulife Investment Management has taken reasonable steps to ensure their accuracy but can’t be held liable for such information being inaccurate. Market conditions may change which may impact the information contained in this document.
You may not modify, copy, reproduce, publish, upload, post, transmit, distribute, or commercially exploit in any way any content included in this communication. Unauthorized downloading, re-transmission, storage in any medium, copying, redistribution, or republication for any purpose is strictly prohibited without the written permission of Manulife Investment Management.
Manulife Investment Management is a trade name of Manulife Investment Management Limited and The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company.
Manulife, Manulife Investment Management, the Stylized M Design, and Manulife Investment Management & Stylized M Design are trademarks of The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company and are used by it, and by its affiliates under license.